‘My husband sold me to another man’

When Arthur Cort wanted to divorce his wife, Betty, accusing her of ‘committing adultery with 4 different men’, he had to go to a church court sitting at Richmond in Yorkshire to plead his case.

This was in 1824 when such matters were dealt with by the Church of England, not by the civil courts. The church court was the Consistory Court of the Archdeaconery of Richmond.

A handwritten letter dated July 27, 1824, from Preston, expressing regret for not being able to attend court due to financial constraints and addressing a legal issue related to another party.

Betty wrote to the court from Preston, where she was presumably living, to defend herself and to explain that she could not appear in person because she had no money to make the journey.

In her letter, she wrote that there was no proof of her adulteries, whereas she could prove how badly her husband had treated her, including selling her to another man.

The court sided with the husband and granted him his divorce

This is what Betty wrote:


Preston July 27. 1824.
Sir,
I am sorry to inform you I am not able to come to appear in the court at Richmond according to request on Thursday next & I have no money to carry on the business. I have likewise to inform you my Lawful Husband Arthur Cort has laid things to my charge which cannot be proved, if I had money I could produce Witnesses of his ill usage to me in different ways and he at one time even sold me to another man & many other things I could prove against him if I had money to come forward with.
I am your most humble Servt. Betty Cort.


We know about the case because the court records are preserved at Lancashire Archives. This is the catalogue description, which, surprisingly, makes no mention of the sale of the wife:


Divorce Cause Papers: Cort v Cort, 1824-1825

Papers in a divorce case between Arthur Cort of Wray, yeoman and his wife Betty Cort (formerly Titterington); they were married in 1810 at Lancaster, St Mary and subsequently lived at Wray until 1817 when Betty left her husband; Arthur accuses her of committing adultery with 4 different men in the intervening 7 years before this case comes to court and he has witness statements to confirm his claims; there is also a letter written by Betty to the Court saying that Arthur has accused her of things which cannot be proved; depositions are given by Thomas Fisher of Tatham, husbandman, aged 21, James Craven of Preston, weaver, aged 49, Peter Langtree of Preston, cotton spinner, aged 26; final decree granting Arthur a divorce “and separated from bed board and mutual conhabitation…until they shall be reconciled to each other”.


This is the bare bones of the case. It takes eighteen separate paper sheets to tell the full story: Lancashire Archives: the Divorce Cause Papers: Cort v Cort, 1824-1825 (ARR/2/4/6/4/4).


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply