1648 Battle of Preston archaeology report

Over the last year, I have featured a number of posts on the Preston History Facebook group about research into the 1648 Battle of Preston by a Glasgow University PhD student, Andrew Stafford, and the archaeological dig he was organising at Brookfield Park looking for evidence of the battle.

This morning he emailed me the report of the dig. It runs to more than a hundred pages and more than 30,000 words. Itโ€™s a very extensive account not just of the excavation, but also of the history of the battle and of the later history of the Ribbleton district. And Andrew tells me that he is โ€˜planning possible further surveys elsewhere in Prestonโ€™.

Andrew was particularly pleased with the help he received from members of my Facebook group when we posted an appeal for suggestions that could help him in his research. In his report, Andrew writes that this group provided โ€˜invaluable support by posting appeals for information on [its] Facebook page, which generated a wealth of leads and eyewitness accounts that proved essential to the present studyโ€™.

The report draws on information from this website and from Ashley Warren Prestpon’s Walton-le-Dale website, including several photographs and maps.

I will shortly add the report to the Preston History Library on my website, and add more posts here about the findings. In the meantime, here is the introduction to the report:


A programme of archaeological metal detecting and test pitting was conducted between the 17th and 19th February 2026 at Brookfield Park, Preston, to investigate the initial stage of the 1648 Battle of Preston. The fieldwork was enacted as part of the Preston Battlefield Project, a component of a PhD study by Andrew Stafford at the University of Glasgow. The work was undertaken to further historical understanding of this decisive engagement in the Second English Civil War, following documented written records that place the initial clash between Royalist and Parliamentarian forces along the Longridge Road in the Eaves Brook area of Fulwood.

A Desk-Based Assessment (DBA) was undertaken prior to the fieldwork to evaluate the archaeological potential of the site. This included a review of previous archaeological investigations, known heritage assets, and a detailed analysis of historic maps, publications, and newspaper accounts from the 18th century onwards. This research identified both previously recorded and potentially overlooked evidence for the battle, while also providing a detailed overview of landscape development, particularly relating to the transformation of the area from an agricultural to an urbanised residential district. Such changes have significant implications for the survival, accessibility, and distribution of battlefield-related material.

The fieldwork was designed to address these issues through a targeted programme of systematic survey and investigation. Its primary aims were to identify and record artefactual evidence associated with the battle, to evaluate the extent to which such material survives within the study area, and to assess the role of Eaves Brook as a potential tactical feature during the opening phase of the engagement. In addition, the project sought to examine how Post-Medieval and Modern landscape modificationโ€”particularly the alteration of Eaves Brookโ€”may have affected the preservation and spatial patterning of archaeological remains. Through this approach, the fieldwork sought to contribute to the wider interpretation of the battleโ€™s location and character, while also assessing the effectiveness and limitations of archaeological survey methods in recovering battlefield evidence within a heavily altered landscape.


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One thought on “1648 Battle of Preston archaeology report

  1. This sounds very interesting, can’t wait to read the full report!๐Ÿ˜Ž

Leave a Reply