See also: Public School Prestonians
The mathematician and fellow of Cambridge University John Venn, best remembered for his Venn diagrams, devoted many years of his life to compiling biographical information on former members of his university. He was helped by his son, also named John, who continued the work after his death.
Their combined labours resulted in 10 volumes containing short but comprehensive biographies of thousands of Cambridge men (there were no women); the equivalent for Oxford contains much scantier entries.  The volumes were published between 1922 and 1954.  A further contribution came in the 1960s with the publication of Emden’s work on the pre-1500 period. 
The work of all three was incorporated and expanded by a Cambridge project designed to digitise the biographies and build a database from them.  This latest venture included the women’s colleges and took the total number of biographies to around 150,000. The trials and tribulations involved in the exercise were described in a conference paper in 2000 by one of the members of the project, John Dawson. 
Early attempts at digitisation in the 1970s were abandoned because of the complexity of the task. When Dawson came at it again the availability of more sophisticated optical character recognition tools made the whole project more feasible. Even so, the complexity remained and taxed the project workers’ computational skills to the limit.
Things were probably not helped by the lack of consistency in the entries supplied by Venn senior, a surprising failing in the work of a mathematician and logician. As a result, the whole project looked like foundering, as Dawson notes:
Glancing at the pages of Venn’s biographies gives a first impression that they are very regular, with keywords such as ‘Matric.’ and ‘School’ clearly signalling well-structured phrases. However, this is only what the human eye and brain make of the material! When an attempt is made to parse these sentences automatically, all sorts of horrors arise.
Fortunately, the project was pursued and the results are now freely available on line. Also on line are the 10 volumes produced by the Venns:
Part I. From the earliest times to 1751.
Vol. i. Abbas – Cutts, 1922. Online version at the Internet Archive.
Vol. ii. Dabbs – Juxton, 1922. Online version at the Internet Archive.
Vol. iii. Kaile – Ryves, 1924. Online version at the Internet Archive
Vol. iv. Saal – Zuinglius, 1927. Online version at the Internet Archive
Part II. 1752–1900.
Vol. i. Abbey – Challis, 1940. Online version at the Internet Archive
Vol. ii. Chalmers – Fytche, 1944. Online version at the Internet Archive
Vol. iii. Gabb – Justamond, 1947. Online version at the Internet Archive
Vol. iv. Kahlenberg – Oyler, 1947. Online version at the Internet Archive
Vol. v. Pace – Spyers, 1953. Online version at the Internet Archive
Vol. vi. Square – Zupitza, 1954. Online version at the Internet Archive
John Dawson’s on-line version comes with a very good search engine that means it is very easy to locate specific entries. Thus, inserting the terms ‘Preston’ and ‘Lancashire’ yields 407 entries. When entries for the ‘wrong’ Prestons and those with only a passing link to the Lancashire town are weeded out some 321 useful Preston entries remain: just 16 of those entries are for women.
The entries relating to Preston are spread somewhat thinly over the more than three centuries they cover and so do not lend themselves to more than the minimal quantified treatment above. Where they do prove more illuminating is in the detail they supply of individual lives (something sadly lacking for the publication devoted to Oxford graduates). See: Some notable Preston Cambridge alumni.
The entries contain a wealth of information about two groups of Cambridge graduates: those who originated in Preston (148 entries) and those from elsewhere whose school days or subsequent careers, frequently as Anglican clerics, brought them to the town (173). Other sets can be assembled to form a sort of Venn diagram of various groups, such as Preston Grammar School and Park School pupils and staff who graduated from Cambridge.
The material can be treated in the mass to give some indication of the social background of those who benefited from a Cambridge education, since the father’s occupation is often given: of the 148 entries for Preston ‘natives’, 94 list father’s occupations. Local knowledge would easily supply information where it is not listed, as well as supplying the occupations of those who are listed as gentlemen or esquires.
There is a preponderance of professionals, especially Anglican clergy, among the fathers of Preston graduates: army officers (3), barristers (2), clergy (17), doctors (7), solicitors (6). Trade supplies just four (possibly six) cotton merchants, three drapers, one druggist, one mercer, one tea dealer and one warehouseman. Probably more of those engaged in trade are hidden by their affixing ‘esq.’ or ‘gent.’ to their names and omitting their occupation, if any.
While 27 of the Preston boys are identified as being educated at the town’s grammar school (and sometimes at additional schools), a further 79 did not attend the grammar school and were educated elsewhere, with Sedbergh School (12) being the most popular. No school details were available for 38 of the entries. The female graduates who were born in Preston are too few to makea reasonable comparison.
Cambridge colleges fielded 11 Preston Grammar School headmasters from the 16th century through to the end of the 19th-century, including in the late 17th century George Walmsley, Richard Croston and Thomas Whitehead.
Throughout the period covered by these records Cambridge undergraduates can be divided into separate status groups: sizars, who acted as college servants in return for their education; pensioners, gentlemen who paid for their education; fellow commoners, more affluent undergraduates who paid extra fees and could join the college fellows at the high table. Separate again were those in receipt of a scholarship.
The figures for those arriving at Cambridge from Preston were: sizar (23), pensioner (96), fellow commoner (8), scholar (4), not given (13).
After leaving college, the 148 members of Cambridge’s Preston contingent followed a fairly limited range of careers, predominantly being ordained into the Church of England. There were 50 Anglican clerics, 13 barristers, 10 schoolmasters and 2 schoolmistresses, 5 army officers, 4 doctors, 3 lecturers, 2 solicitors, 2 town clerks, a civil engineer, a company director, a possible ironmaster, a nonconformist minister and a tax collector. No occupation was given for 48 graduates, many of whom would have been members of the landed gentry and ‘lived off the land’ (see: Who owned Lancashire?).
Cambridge graduates from elsewhere who pursued their careers in Preston were similarly likely to be predominantly clerics. In fact, the town seemed to have provided a training ground for aspiring vicars in the 19th century with a steady stream of newly-ordained clerics coming to the town to serve as curates for a short period before moving onwards and upwards.
Preston churches and their Cambridge curates
(when someone is described simply as curate of Preston it probably means of St John’s, the parish church)
|All Saints’||1899||1902||William Edward Hatton-Williams||Peterhouse|
|Christ Church||1843||1845||William John Monk||St John’s|
|Christ Church||1872||1876||Francis John Dickson||Trinity|
|Christ Church||1876||1877||Norris Dredge||St John’s|
|Christ Church||1889||1894||John Morris Bowen||Christ’s|
|Emmanuel||1872||1876||Thomas Barton Spencer||St John’s|
|Preston||1799||1808||Thomas Saul||St John’s|
|Preston||1840||1842||John Charles Whish||Trinity|
|Preston||1889||1897||Edward Eyre Goold-Adams||Jesus|
|St George’s||1850||1862||Charles Harrison Wood||Christ’s|
|St George’s||1909||1910||James Boyle||Corpus Christi|
|St James’s||1841||1842||Philip Walker Copeman||Queens’|
|St John’s||1689||1689||James Bland||St John’s|
|St John’s||1841||1843||Charles Richson||St Catharine’s|
|St John’s||1886||1888||Henry Henn||Trinity Hall|
|St John’s||1893||1897||Thomas Pearson||Christ’s|
|St John’s||1847||1850||John Wilson||St John’s|
|St Jude’s||1898||1901||James Richard Foster||St John’s|
|St Luke’s||1885||1890||Robert Minnitt||Trinity|
|St Luke’s||1890||1893||David Ernest Walker||St John’s|
|St Mary’s||1851||1856||William Maude Haslewood||St John’s|
|St Mary’s||1857||1858||John Shaw||St John’s|
|St Mary’s||1873||1875||William Robert Worthington||Corpus Christi|
|St Mary’s||1885||1887||Harry Spencer Moore||Peterhouse|
|St Paul’s||1851||1854||James Hadfield||St John’s|
|St Paul’s||1857||1859||William Winlaw||St John’s|
|St Paul’s||1880||1881||Martin Shipham Munroe||Pembroke|
|St Paul’s||1886||1890||John Russell Napier||Trinity|
|St Paul’s||1886||1893||Frederick Eugène Perrin||St John’s|
|St Paul’s||1895||1902||Henry Pritt||Queens’|
|St Paul’s||1895||1898||Arthur William Charles||Trinity Hall|
|St Paul’s||1896||1899||Charles James Ferguson-Davie||Trinity Hall|
|St Paul’s||1899||1902||David Alston Hall||St Catharine’s|
|St Paul’s||1902||1906||Alfred Metcalfe Stephens||Corpus Christi|
|St Paul’s||1907||1907||Raymond Hargrave||Queens’|
|St Peter’s||1841||1842||Thomas Gleadowe Fearne||Not Given|
|St Peter’s||1879||1883||Alexander Glen Bott||St John’s|
|St Thomas’s||1845||1850||John Francis Israel Herschell||Queens’|
|St Thomas’s||1859||1862||Richard Price||St John’s|
|St Thomas’s||1893||1900||George Richard Plews||Matric Non-Coll|
|St Thomas’s||1906||1917||Archibald Edward Allen||Selwyn|
|Trinity||1848||1850||John Kitton||St John’s|
|Trinity||1897||1904||Benjamin Allen Berry||Peterhouse|