On this day … 16 June 1849

The Preston Guardian carried a report on the church burial grounds in the town, prompted by a visit by a government inspector earlier in the month. His findings about two of them make grim reading, with paupers’ coffins left in open pits.

Of the seventeen church burial grounds in the town at that time, he passed comment on four. Two pleased him, but the other two he condemned as a danger to health. All seventeen should be closed, he urged, and replaced with a cemetery on the outskirts of the town. His comments were reported in the Preston Chronicle.

1840s map of Preston showing burial grounds
National Library of Scotland: https://maps.nls.uk/view/102343946

๐’๐ญ ๐๐š๐ฎ๐ฅโ€™๐ฌ ๐›๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐

โ€˜On inspecting the church-yard he found at the corner a large open pit, similar to what they had in Italy, and which frequently bred a pest. For the benefit of the poor there were rows of coffins in the pit. He believed there were seven in it when he had inspected it.โ€™

He was told that a further eighteen coffins were due to be placed in the pit.

โ€˜The sexton informed him that a layer of sand, two feet deep, was spread over the coffins, and the grave was kept open a month โ€ฆ At the same time the soil was so good that it would absorb a great quantity of the foetid matter which must necessarily drain away. If instead of being a light sandy soil, it the soil was clayey, there would be quite a different state of things.โ€™

๐’๐ญ ๐–๐ข๐ฅ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐ข๐โ€™๐ฌ ๐›๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐

โ€˜Burial grounds were objectionable in a town, and he thought if all were in excellent order it would still be undesirable to bury in towns. But some of the burial grounds were in an objectionable state. He referred particularly to St. Wilfrid’s. โ€ฆ Some years ago part of the retaining wall of St. Wilfrid’s burial ground had tumbled down. Now if anything went wrong with the wall, the matter oozed out.

โ€˜The part which tumbled down was the north side, towards the west end. The part most objectionable was to the south side, on which there was a house. He thought that this burial ground, like the rest, should be closed; and all burials should take place at a distance, and he considered that there should be a public cemetery.โ€™

๐’๐ญ ๐ˆ๐ ๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฎ๐ฌโ€™ ๐›๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐

โ€˜He had next visited St. Ignatius’s Church โ€ฆ and there also they found an open pit, but not on as large a scale as the pit in St. Pauls church-yard. The burial ground was not crowded, but wanted a little order and neatness, and would add much to the appearance of the place The general disposition of the ground did great credit to the community who had bought it and laid it out.โ€™

๐’๐ญ ๐๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ซโ€™๐ฌ ๐›๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐

โ€˜โ€ฆ he went to St. Peter’s church. On the east and north sides, there were some very nice houses. The railway passed on the south and west; the houses were rather inferior. The general aspect of the whole, however, he thought uncommonly good. In the churchyard there was an open grave; but the position of the church and the nature of the soil was such, that a man would be clever if he was to be poisoned. He thought the square was very much a gainer having a church and burial-ground in the centre; for, otherwise, they would not have got so large a space. When the churchyard should cease to be used as a burial ground, it would become nicely overgrown with grass, and altogether, would add very much to the beauty of the surrounding property.โ€™


Good source:
http://www.mit-stamtrae.co.uk/st_wilfrids/st_wilfrids_preston_index.htm


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply