On this day … 29 November 1856

The Preston Guardian carried a report on the discoveries made by archaeologists at Castle Hill, Penwortham. The discoveries are given a lengthy treatment in Charles Hardwick’s History of Preston, not surprisingly since he was the person directing the amateur archaeologists who carried out the dig.

The suggestions they proposed for the origin of the site, dating it back to Roman and Saxon days, have since been rejected: it was a Norman motte and bailey castle. But what Hardwick’s account does capture is the excitement that must have gripped those early amateurs as they uncovered a lost past.

Castle Hill Penwortham drawing 1
Above and below: drawings of the Castle Hill finds by Charles Hardwick
Castle Hill Preston drawing 2

Those amateurs have not been treated sympathetically by later writers:

‘They encountered interesting features which might have proved highly informative to modern researchers: unfortunately the quality of the work was poor, the descriptions very unscientific and the interpretations of the finds colourful but erroneous.’

Possibly, the successors to today’s archaeologists in 150 years’ time, with similar hindsight, will express similar regrets.

A more sympathetic appreciation of Hardwick’s efforts would see him as the father of archaeological investigations in Preston, however amateur. Indeed, the discoveries at Penwortham and especially at Walton-le-Dale caused him to delay the publication of his history to include a detailed account of the sites:

‘… the discovery, by the author, of a Roman station at Walton-le-dale, which necessitated a complete revision of the then presumed Roman topography of Lancashire; the excavations of the Castle Hill, Penwortham, by the Lancashire and Cheshire Historic Society, where unique and most interesting remains were discovered, and the probable connection, first suggested by the author, of the Cuerdale treasure with the great battle of Brunanburh.’

Hardwick’s discoveries at Walton-le-Dale persuaded the society to visit Preston, as he recorded in his history:

‘The discovery of the Roman station at Walton giving additional archaeological interest to the neighbourhood, the members of the Lancashire and Cheshire Historic Society selected Preston as the locale for their annual excursion. They accordingly visited the town in June last, (1856). An influential committee undertook to prepare for their reception, and a temporary museum of interesting local antiquities was formed, at the Institution, Avenham.

‘In addition to an inspection of the site at Walton, it was deemed desirable that excavations should be made in the “Castle hill,” Penwortham. The necessary permission having been obtained, work-men were employed on the day previous to the visit, in cutting trenches across the crown of the hill, and in opening various portions of the mound. Remains so interesting, and, at the same time, apparently so irreconcilable, were obtained, that the committee continued the excavations during the remainder of the week.’

Hardwick attributed a Roman origin to another find at Penwortham, which he linked to the discoveries at Castle Hill. That find suffered the fate of so many archaeological remains, then and now:

‘About forty years ago, a piece of boulder pavement was discovered near Penwortham hall. It was four feet in breadth, and was traced about one hundred yards. Mr. Baines says:—”The road surveyor, feeling no sympathy with the antiquary, destroyed the road, and used the materials to repair the public highways! conceiving that, probably, to be the shortest way of solving the disputes which had arisen, whether this was a Roman, a Saxon, or a Norman causeway.” There can be little doubt, however, that the road was a Roman vicinal way, communicating from the station at Walton with the specula at Penwortham’.

Hardwick’s attribution of a Roman origin for his boulder pavement did not survive the considered conclusion of his contemporary, the Rev William Thornber, the historian of the Fylde, who wrote an account of the Castle Hill discoveries for the journal of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire:

‘… for I conceive, that the pavement of boulders discovered by Mr. Marshall of Penwortham Lodge can have been nothing more, from its narrowness, than an ancient bridle path, very common throughout the country.’

Thornber did however thank Hardwick for the use of his notes on the Castle Hill excavation, included two of his drawings in his article (reproduced here) and paid tribute to his work in uncovering the archaeology of Preston: ‘… it was the fortune of Mr. Hardwick to earn the crown, worthy to adorn the brow of such a discoverer.’

It is too easy now to be dismissive of the early speculations of amateur archaeologists like Hardwick, just as nineteenth-century local historians are sometimes pejoratively labelled antiquarians. But then, how will today’s archaeologists and historians be judged by their successors?


Sources
Hardwick’s History of Preston
The HSL&C article: https://www.hslc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/9-6-Thornber.pdf


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply