On this day … 18 October 1745

A letter written by Sir Henry Hoghton to George Kenyon, clerk of the peace for Lancashire (chief executive), reveals his desire to persecute and prosecute local Catholics implicated in the Jacobite Rebellion of that year. The leader of the rebellion, Bonnie Prince Charlie, reached Preston the following month.

Bonnie Prince Charlie
Prince Charles Edward Stuart, studio of Antonio David, oil on canvas, feigned oval, circa 1729. ยฉ National Portrait Gallery, London: https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/use-this-image/?mkey=mw01241

Hoghton, a long-time scourge of Catholics and Jacobites, was writing from Walton Hall, which the family had made their main seat rather than their older and later residence Hoghton Tower, and the letter shows that he was not happy with what he viewed as Kenyonโ€™s leniency towards the countyโ€™s Catholics. He points out that such leniency was not shown to the โ€˜popish interestโ€™ following the previous Jacobite Rebellion in 1715.

His letter is among the correspondence collected in the Kenyon Papers, and reads as follows (the original is all one sentence; it is not known which Mr Molyneux is referred to):

โ€˜1745, October 18. Walton. โ€”I hope, as you promised Mr. Molyneux and me at Chorley, I shall shortly have an account that you have recorded the convictions. You owned that you were not a judicial but a ministerial officer, which is certainly true, and, as such, are obliged to observe the plain direction of the Act of Parliament, which I and several of the Justices of Peace have often called upon you to do.

โ€˜It will not be sufficient excuse to say you are advised to the contrary, or that it has not been done in other counties; neither can justify you in such neglect; there was not such a tenderness shewed to the popish interest, the last rebellion, and as the expectation of the rebells now must be from the support they expect from the popish interest, there is the same reason and necessity to record the convictions now as there was then.โ€™

A rebuttal followed swiftly in a lengthy letter thought by the internal evidence to be addressed to Hoghton from a Mr T. Bootle, who wrote warning that convicting Catholics would infuriate rather than quieten them (Bootle is possibly Thomas Bootle of Lathom Hall near Liverpool, who was MP for the town from 1724 to 1734 and its mayor 1726/7):

โ€˜When I was last in the country, I acquainted you and many other justices of the peace, that to carry the proceedings against the papists upon the last proclamation to a complete conviction, would be wrong. That convicting them would not disable, but rather exasperate, and be a means to drive them into rebellion, or at least furnish them with a plausible pretence for taking so desperate a step.โ€™

Bootle argued that if any Catholics refused to swear allegiance to the king, it would be sufficient punishment โ€˜to take from the refusers their horses and armesโ€™. He says that Hoghton and Molyneux had little support for further penalties from most of their fellow JPs or the Lord Lieutenant of Lancashire, the Earl of Derby, who felt that the matter should:

โ€˜โ€ฆ be left to the judgment and discretion of the Privy Council. With this, every justice of the peace with whom I conversed (who were many) was perfectly satisfied, as was also my Lord Derby, the Lord Lieutenant, with whom I also talked upon this subject; and I do not hear but that every justice in the county, save yourself and Mr. Molyneux, continue in the same mind.โ€™

Hoghtonโ€™s insistence in his โ€˜menacingโ€™ letter that the clerk of the peace should pursue further prosecutions of the Catholics did not please Mr Bootle:

โ€˜But, to my great surprise, hearing that you by a menacing letter to the Clerk of the Peace were for forcing him to return into Chancery all the convictions which have been returned to the Quarter Sessions, I thereupon acquainted several of the Privy Council with what you were doing, who, I take the liberty to tell you, do not approve of your conduct.โ€™

Bootle was not defending Catholics, rather he feared that prosecuting them too severely would drive them into the arms of the Jacobites:

โ€˜I believe that none can doubt but that my zeal for his Majesty, his family, and his Government, is equal to any justices’ in the county; and, did I think that convicting the papists would tend to disable them, or add the least security, strength, or safety, to the Government, I should be as forward as any man in the kingdom to have it done immediately; but as I am convinced it will have quite a contrary effectโ€”instead of disabling, it will irritate and provoke, and make them the more desperateโ€”it is from that cause, and that only, that I thus interpose. While they are quiet (as I do not hear from any quarter but they are), let us not, from a mistaken zeal, do anything to provoke them and give them a handle for disturbance or drive them into rebellion, and give them ground to say you have done your worst, and so make them desperate.โ€™


Sources
The Kenyon Papers: https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/_/VWI_AQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
Sir Henry Hoghton: https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1690-1715/member/hoghton-sir-henry-1678-1768
Thomas Bootle: https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1715-1754/member/bootle-thomas-1685-1753


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply