On this day … 15 August 1848

Trustees were appointed for the Henry and Eleanor Rishton Charity to buy land and use the rents to help the poor of Preston. But when the charity commissioners came to look at the charity in the next century, they discovered that no land had been purchased and it was not clear if any poor people ever benefitted from the bequest.

What had gone wrong?

According to the Preston Chronicle, Henry and Eleanor Rishton of Bath gave ยฃ300 to buy land in Preston and instructed the trustees appointed to use half the rents from the land to buy apprenticeships for poor children in the town and the other half to be distributed ‘in sums not less than a 6d. each amongst the poor persons of the townโ€™.

The Rishtons clearly believed that charity began at home, for Henry stipulated that any of their descendants who were in need should be at the front of the queue when the charity funds were distributed. And after the family needs had been met, the next preference should go to the members of the Church of England.

ยฃ300 might seem a small sum today, but it equated to more than ยฃ30,000 at the time of the bequest, and if it had been used to buy land in the town, that land would have appreciated considerably in value when development plots such as Winckley Square were opened up in the nineteenth century.

Somehow and unexplainably the bequest ended up in the hands of the Rawstorne family of Penwortham and Hutton.

When the charity commissioners investigated they discovered that it was held by the executors of the late Col Lawrence Rawstorne, and that ยฃ200 of the money was secured on a bond given by his grandfather in 1795. No trace of the paperwork relating to the bequest or the bond could be produced, so there was no way of knowing how it had ended up with the Rawstornes, or who had benefitted from the money.

In 1857, Rawstorneโ€™s executors agreed to pay the ยฃ300 with interest to new trustees appointed by the corporation. These trustees were the senior aldermen of Preston: Thomas Monk, John Paley, Thomas Brown and Thomas Miller.

From then, the bequest was managed by the mayor, who distributed ยฃ5 13s. 4d. to Prestonโ€™s poor once a year. They got 2s. 6d. each.

Another Col Lawrence Rawstorne, in the seventeenth century, was troubled by the poor of the Hutton township, which he owned and for which he had to bear the poor rate charge. He felt that the neighbouring townships should contribute more because he was burdened with far more poor than them. He sent the following complaint to Roger Kenyon, Lancashireโ€™s clerk of the peace or chief executive:

โ€˜Hutton, one of the townes within the Parish of Penworth[am], is sore burdened with their poore, is not at all eased by the rest [the neighbouring townships], notwithstanding they have no poore, some of them, and the rest not in any equality. โ€ฆ If you think it feasible, pray you promote that the parish may be chardged mutually to contribute with it (as by law you know it ought) and it will be a great kindness to us, for the greatest share lyes indeed uppon me.โ€™


Source
The Preston Chronicle, freely available on line to members of the Lancashire County Council library: https://www.lancashire.gov.uk/libraries-and-archives/libraries/digital-library/newspapers-old-and-new/


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply