On this day … 23 July 1887

The Preston Guardian reported the resignation of Edward Garlick as chief engineer for the construction of Preston Dock. His health was breaking down, and he had presented his last report a month earlier. His junior partner, Benjamin Sykes, replaced him

In 1861, he had been the first to propose building a Preston Dock, a more ambitious undertaking than had previously been considered by the Ribble Navigation Company, which was by then more concerned with selling as farm land the thousands of acres it had reclaimed on either side of the river.

Four years later the company had come round to Garlickโ€™s way of thinking, urged on by a group of local councillors, and he drew up plans for a dock. Garlick proposed converting the Ribble from Fishergate to Ashton into a 31-acre dock, with the river itself diverted to the south.

Garlick was the companyโ€™s engineer for more than thirty years, and before that for ten years he was the pupil, then assistant and finally partner of the companyโ€™s first engineer, Philip Park.

His involvement with the development of Preston extended beyond the Ribble works. From his office in Winckley Square, he and his partners were responsible for designing a number of buildings in the town, including the Conservative Club in Guildhall Street, the old Preston Gas Companyโ€™s offices on Fishergate and the old Harris Orphanage on Garstang Road

Garlickโ€™s involvement in the public life of the town culminated in his election as mayor in 1882. His old partner, Philip Park, had similarly been elected mayor twenty years earlier.

A few years later, he began to come in for criticism for his handling of the dock scheme, although James Barron, the historian of the Ribble Navigation and himself the Preston Dock engineer from 1901 to 1933, rejected attacks on Garlickโ€™s good faith:

โ€˜Reckless mis-statements were the rule at this time โ€ฆ and little credence need be placed on the whispered confidences of those who revelled in a pretended knowledge of underhand dealing. The fact appears to be that there was not a vestige of truth in these tales.โ€™

Garlickโ€™s pay for the work on the scheme came in the form of a percentage of the cost of the undertaking, and it was probably this that led critics to suggest this was an inducement for him to propose a more ambitious scheme than made financial sense.

But his supporters won the day, carried away by prospect of enormous profits, as Barron commented:

โ€˜Ribble enthusiasts held and disseminated fantastic visions of the marvellous revolution that was to take place in the town of Preston by the making of the new dock and channel to Lytham. Similar hopes were entertained by a great majority of the ratepayers who lost their sense of proportion, and made it so uncomfortable for those who did not share their views, that opponents dare not voice their opinions.

โ€˜The Ribble scheme was to bring untold prosperity to all classes, and opponents were treated with derision. Some ratepayers even believed that not only would the Ribble support itself but would bring in such a revenue as would pay all the rates of the town and more.โ€™


Sources
Barronโ€™s History of the Ribble Navigation
Hewitsonโ€™s History of Preston


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply