On this day … 9 July 1926

Dr Charles Rigby, the husband of the militant suffragette Edith Rigby, died. The anniversary provides a hook for an alternative account of the Edith Rigby story that might provoke the sort of discussion that makes the study of history so interesting, and so open to different interpretations.

Charles Rigby’s death came thirteen years to the month after his wife was jailed for nine months at Liverpool for planting a bomb at the Cotton Exchange Buildings in the city and burning down the summer home of Sir William Lever and his wife at Rivington.

It is not known to what extent Charles Rigby was an accessory to his wife’s crimes, since he was never charged with any offence. What is known is that he lent her the services of his chauffeur to carry her and her can of paraffin from their Winckley Square home to Rivington to burn down the bungalow. Should the chauffeur have been charged as an accessory?

Lady Lever was a rather strange choice of victim, since she and her husband were both supporters of votes for women. Sadly, she died just three weeks after her beloved Rivington home was burned down by Edith Rigby.

Sir William, later Lord Leverhulme, rebuilt the bungalow after his wife’s death, stipulating that it must be made fireproof. The Rivington estate is now being lovingly restored, and it was at Rivington that Edith Rigby’s niece and biographer, Phoebe Hesketh, made her home.

If Charles Rigby was not an accessory to his wife’s crimes, he was certainly a supporter of her actions. In 1907 she was jailed for a month along with other suffragettes who staged a protest in London. The Lancashire Daily Post had no sympathy for their actions, hoping that they:

‘… would undergo the full rigours of prison discipline … [and] be allowed to serve their full term without any amelioration of their conditions’.

The editorial prompted a swift response from Charles Rigby, in a letter to the paper, defending his wife. He deplored the tone of the editorial, which he believed ‘… to be greater brutality in words than anything that has been done in deed by any suffragist now in prison’. Would a brutal use of words surpass the brutality of planting bombs and burning down houses, to which his wife graduated?

Edith Rigby justified her actions with the following words:

‘I want to ask Sir William Lever whether he thinks his property on Rivington Pike is more valuable as one of his superfluous houses occasionally opened to people, or as a beacon lighted to King and Country to see here are some intolerable grievances for women.’

However noble the cause and however much Edith Rigby felt her actions were justified, imagine if a Just Stop Oil protester decided that merely disrupting events was not achieving anything and instead carried a can of petrol to the home of an oil company chief executive and burned it down. Should they be punished or celebrated?


For more on Edith Rigby::
https://www.winckleysquarepreston.org/heritage/edith-rigby/


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply