On this day … 9 November 1878

The Preston Guardian reported proposals for an ‘Industrial Home for Fallen Women’ that would provide a refuge for at least some of the town’s many prostitutes. By early the following year, a lease had been taken on Tulketh Cottage at Ashton to provide ‘accommodation for a considerable number of inmates’, and the Venerable Archdeacon of Lancaster, William Hornby, arrived to officially open the premises.

A committee had been set up to manage the home, with a Mr T. H. Myres as secretary, and ‘stringent rules’ had been drawn up to govern the conduct of the women so that ‘the inhabitants in the locality in which it is situate should not be inconvenienced by it’.

Archdeacon Hornby remarked that those ‘who were acquainted with that class of women in the town of Preston agreed there was not only cause but very great cause for an Industrial Home for Fallen Women’. It would offer an alternative accommodation for those women to that afforded by the large number of brothels in the town.

The archdeacon wanted to rid the town of the ‘uncleanness’ that was the fate of fallen women:

‘They heard a very great deal said about drunkenness in these days, and strong efforts had been made to put down this plague, and it was well that it should be. But while this was so should they not try to put down another plague — that of uncleanness — for there was no sin against which the Bible spoke more strongly than that of uncleanness.’

He urged all those with influence in the town to exert that influence to close the brothels.

The fate of the fallen woman was to be pitied:

‘The life these women led might be pleasure for a time but the time did come sooner or later when all the pleasure was past, and gone, and when nothing but sorrow remained. She dare not go home, if a home she had, for the door would be shut in her face, and the finger of scorn would be pointed at her in her neighbourhood, whilst a home like that they were opening, held itself out to her, where she might find shelter, happiness, and comfort. (Hear, hear).

‘It might be said that there was no hope of reforming such women, but experience declared the contrary. It might be that a woman would find her way to that Home, where she would give up her old ways and by kind tuition turn and walk henceforward in purity of life.’

Next up was the vicar of Preston, who spoke from experience since a great number of those fallen women were to be found seeking custom in the streets behind the parish church:

‘… it was an unfavourable fact that a large proportion of the evil which they were met that day to try to obviate was centred in that part of the town where God had cast his lot to work.

‘He had never passed through those streets, and had never seen those fallen women without sorrow in his heart, and he had thought, since he came to Preston, that a building such as that they were assembled in should be provided, in order that these women might have an open door to escape from that life of wretchedness.’

By the end of the century, the imminent closure of the Ashton home was announced at a meeting of the Preston Ladies Association for the Care of Friendless Girls. Tulketh Cottage was by then in such a dilapidated state that it was not thought to be worth repairing.

What the fate of Preston’s ‘friendless girls’ was when it closed is not known.


Source
Anyone with a Lancashire County Library card can read the Preston Chronicle and many more papers for free here: https://link.gale.com/apps/BNCN?u=lancs&aty=rpas


Discover more from preston history

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “On this day … 9 November 1878

  1. The date on the ‘Ashton Industrial Home’ that replaced Tulketh Cottage is 1892 – which is when The Builder reported work due to begin imminently. The building is still there on Waterloo Road, now divided into flats.

    Tulketh Cottage had been the home of Preston solicitor, WJ Plant, who had moved to Highfield (a smaller version than the house today) on Tulketh Road within Ashton Freehold. The name of a short street presumably named after him marks the rear boundary of Tulketh Cottage.

Leave a Reply