John Hunter Padel – pacifist schoolmaster and psychoanalyst

John Hunter Padel was a leading British psychoanalyst and Shakespeare scholar in the last century who taught classics at Preston Grammar School during World War Two. Padel was a conscientious objector whose beliefs brought him into conflict with the authorities when conscription was introduced.

See also: Preston’s World War 1 conscientious objectors

Padel was born in Carlisle in 1913, the son of the headmaster of Carlisle Grammar School. He studied Classics at Queen’s College, Oxford, where he became a Quaker. After leaving university, he taught at a public school, resigning because of objections to his pacifist teaching. He moved to Preston to teach at the grammar school, and found accommodation in Grimsargh at 3, Lynwood Villas, Whittingham Lane.

Padel continued in teaching until 1949, when, at the age of 36, he began his medical training. He met his wife, Hilda, a granddaughter of Charles Darwin, during the war, and in 1944 they were married. The couple had five children, including the poet Ruth Padel. He died in 1999, aged 86.

The Lancashire Daily Post published a report of his appearance before an Objectors’ Tribunal at Lancaster on 5 August 1940, followed by a report of his appeal against the decision of the tribunal at an Appellate Tribunal in Lancaster on 1 March 1941.

Preston Grammar School 1953
Preston Grammar School 1953

Padel’s articulate defence of his position provides insight into the factors that motivated conscientious objectors. The following are transcripts from the Lancashire Daily Post reports.

The Lancaster Objectors’ Tribunal

‘Padel said he conscientiously objected to all forms of military and alternative service. Having been brought up in a pacifist family, he believed in the wrongfulness of war.

‘He held that it would only be when this attitude of conscientious objection was widely held that wars would cease.

‘Although he felt deep sorrow over the events that necessitated his action, yet he was proud to be numbered among the body of men who, of their deep insight, realised the rightness of their cause.

‘Padel maintained that war did such violence to the hearts and minds of men, and so blinded them to the absolute values of goodness, truth and beauty that it degraded them utterly, and they ceased to know the divinity of their own natures.

‘He also believed that to recognise, or submit to, any form of conscription took away the moral freedom on which alone rested all possibility of the progress of mankind.’

His application was supported by letters from his father and from the Preston Grammar School headmaster, N. Hodgson, ‘who said Padel was a man of integrity and highest Christian principles, and exercised a good influence on the scholars. He could be put to work of a greater national value than that he was doing in the school.’

The tribunal registered him as a conscientious objector, with the added condition that he must accept for non-combatant duties, which he refused.

The Lancaster Appellate Tribunal

Padel appeared before Sir Edward Stubbs, Sir Miles Mitchell and Mr F. Dickinson. He asked that some new written evidence not be made public.

‘The Tribunal accepted the written evidence and at a later stage took part of Padel’s spoken evidence in private.

‘The Chairman commented that it seemed that Padel’s objection to the folly and iniquity of war was a matter of principle.

‘Padel: ‘Not as a matter of principle but as a matter of fact.’

‘Padel said his attitude was not something which had just arisen. War, to him, was not a remote possibility, even in 1932.

‘He had taken the same attitude towards war all his life and had studied at Oxford to go into the question. Pacifism was rooted in religious principles. He joined the Society of Friends in 1935 and the Peace Pledge Union in 1937. Since coming to Preston he had assisted both with money and work in help for refugees and had given up part of his spare time in teaching music and the classics to people who could not pay.

‘Answering Mr Dickinson, appellant said he was not prepared to go into the Friends’ Ambulance unit.

‘He thought that the attitude of the Society of Friends was that it was something for people who felt that they were otherwise cut off from the efforts of their fellows. It provided something not directly connected with war or under Government organisation. He was prepared to relieve suffering wherever he could.

‘Padel’s father, a retired headmaster, said his son felt that the most valuable work he could do was cultural work. His son had held his views continuously and consistently. He had been brought up in a home which had foreshadowed many years ago what was happening now.’

The tribunal overturned the decision of the earlier tribunal that registered him as a conscientious objector on the condition that he undertook non-combatant duties. Padel’s appeal was upheld and he was registered as a conscientious objector with no conditions attached.


Sources
The Lancashire Daily Post: page 5, 5 August 1940 and page 5, 3 March 1941
Obituary in The Independent: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/obituary-dr-john-padel-1128292.html

Leave a Reply