The mathematician and fellow of Cambridge University John Venn, best remembered for his Venn diagrams, devoted many years of his life to compiling biographical information on former members of his university. He was helped by his son, also named John, who continued the work after his death.
Their combined labours resulted in 10 volumes containing short but comprehensive biographies of thousands of Cambridge men (there were no women); the equivalent for Oxford contains much scantier entries. [1] The volumes were published between 1922 and 1954. [2] A further contribution came in the 1960s with the publication of Emden’s work on the pre-1500 period. [3]
The work of all three was incorporated and expanded by a Cambridge project designed to digitise the biographies and build a database from them. [4] This latest venture included the women’s colleges and took the total number of biographies to around 150,000. The trials and tribulations involved in the exercise were described in a conference paper in 2000 by one of the members of the project, John Dawson. [5]
Early attempts at digitisation in the 1970s were abandoned because of the complexity of the task. When Dawson came at it again the availability of more sophisticated optical character recognition tools made the whole project more feasible. Even so, the complexity remained and taxed the project workers’ computational skills to the limit.
Things were probably not helped by the lack of consistency in the entries supplied by Venn senior, a surprising failing in the work of a mathematician and logician. As a result, the whole project looked like foundering, as Dawson notes:
Glancing at the pages of Venn’s biographies gives a first impression that they are very regular, with keywords such as ‘Matric.’ and ‘School’ clearly signalling well-structured phrases. However, this is only what the human eye and brain make of the material! When an attempt is made to parse these sentences automatically, all sorts of horrors arise.
Fortunately, the project was pursued and the results are now freely available on line. Also on line are the 10 volumes produced by the Venns:
John Dawson’s on-line version comes with a very good search engine that means it is very easy to locate specific entries. Thus, inserting the terms ‘Preston’ and ‘Lancashire’ yields 407 entries. When entries for the ‘wrong’ Prestons and those with only a passing link to the Lancashire town are weeded out some 323 useful Preston entries remain: just 16 of those entries are for women.
One caveat is that not all Preston entries are found by the search engine. A particularly glaring example is that for the Rev John Clay, the 19th-century Preston prison chaplain, who was a graduate of Emmanuel College. Entering ‘Preston’ in the search engine brings up the hundreds of entries, but not Rev Clay. Entering ‘Clay’, ‘Emmanuel’ and ‘Preston’ brings no results. Drop ‘Preston’ and he pops up.
The site does contain the following warning: ‘At present, the whole system is experimental. Data may alter or disappear without notice’.
Also not found with a search for ‘Preston’ is Clay’s son Walter Lowe Clay. That is because there is no mention of his Preston connection in his entry.
The entries relating to Preston are spread somewhat thinly over the more than three centuries they cover and so do not lend themselves to more than the minimal quantified treatment above. Where they do prove more illuminating is in the detail they supply of individual lives (something sadly lacking for the publication devoted to Oxford graduates). See: Some notable Preston Cambridge alumni.
The entries contain a wealth of information about two groups of Cambridge graduates: those who originated in Preston (149 entries) and those from elsewhere whose school days or subsequent careers, frequently as Anglican clerics, brought them to the town (174). Other sets can be assembled to form a sort of Venn diagram of various groups, such as Preston Grammar School and Park School pupils and staff who graduated from Cambridge.
The material can be treated in the mass to give some indication of the social background of those who benefited from a Cambridge education, since the father’s occupation is often given: of the 148 entries for Preston ‘natives’, 95 list father’s occupations. Local knowledge would easily supply information where it is not listed, as well as supplying the occupations of those who are listed as gentlemen or esquires.
There is a preponderance of professionals, especially Anglican clergy, among the fathers of Preston graduates: army officers (3), barristers (2), clergy (18), doctors (7), solicitors (6). Trade supplies just four (possibly six) cotton merchants, three drapers, one druggist, one mercer, one tea dealer and one warehouseman. Probably more of those engaged in trade are hidden by their affixing ‘esq.’ or ‘gent.’ to their names and omitting their occupation, if any.
While 27 of the Preston boys are identified as being educated at the town’s grammar school (and sometimes at additional schools), a further 79 did not attend the grammar school and were educated elsewhere, with Sedbergh School (12) being the most popular. No school details were available for 39 of the entries. The female graduates who were born in Preston are too few to makea reasonable comparison.
Cambridge colleges fielded 11 Preston Grammar School headmasters from the 16th century through to the end of the 19th-century, including in the late 17th century George Walmsley, Richard Croston and Thomas Whitehead.
Throughout the period covered by these records Cambridge undergraduates can be divided into separate status groups: sizars, who acted as college servants in return for their education; pensioners, gentlemen who paid for their education; fellow commoners, more affluent undergraduates who paid extra fees and could join the college fellows at the high table. Separate again were those in receipt of a scholarship.
The figures for those arriving at Cambridge from Preston were: sizar (23), pensioner (96), fellow commoner (8), scholar (4), not given (13).
After leaving college, the 148 members of Cambridge’s Preston contingent followed a fairly limited range of careers, predominantly being ordained into the Church of England. There were 51 Anglican clerics, 13 barristers, 10 schoolmasters and 2 schoolmistresses, 5 army officers, 4 doctors, 3 lecturers, 2 solicitors, 2 town clerks, a civil engineer, a company director, a possible ironmaster, a nonconformist minister and a tax collector. No occupation was given for 48 graduates, many of whom would have been members of the landed gentry and ‘lived off the land’ (see: Who owned Lancashire?).
Cambridge graduates from elsewhere who pursued their careers in Preston were similarly likely to be predominantly clerics. In fact, the town seemed to have provided a training ground for aspiring vicars in the 19th century with a steady stream of newly-ordained clerics coming to the town to serve as curates for a short period before moving onwards and upwards.
Preston churches and their Cambridge curates (when someone is described simply as curate of Preston it probably means of St John’s, the parish church)
Church
From
To
Name
College
All Saints’
1899
1902
William Edward Hatton-Williams
Peterhouse
Christ Church
1843
1845
William John Monk
St John’s
Christ Church
1872
1876
Francis John Dickson
Trinity
Christ Church
1876
1877
Norris Dredge
St John’s
Christ Church
1889
1894
John Morris Bowen
Christ’s
Emmanuel
1872
1876
Thomas Barton Spencer
St John’s
Preston
1799
1808
Thomas Saul
St John’s
Preston
1827
1834
Thomas Clark
Queens’
Preston
1837
1839
Charles Wagstaff
Trinity
Preston
1840
1842
John Charles Whish
Trinity
Preston
1875
1877
William Ritson
Pembroke
Preston
1889
1897
Edward Eyre Goold-Adams
Jesus
St George’s
1850
1862
Charles Harrison Wood
Christ’s
St George’s
1909
1910
James Boyle
Corpus Christi
St James’s
1841
1842
Philip Walker Copeman
Queens’
St John’s
1689
1689
James Bland
St John’s
St John’s
1841
1843
Charles Richson
St Catharine’s
St John’s
1886
1888
Henry Henn
Trinity Hall
St John’s
1893
1897
Thomas Pearson
Christ’s
St John’s
1847
1850
John Wilson
St John’s
St Jude’s
1898
1901
James Richard Foster
St John’s
St Luke’s
1885
1890
Robert Minnitt
Trinity
St Luke’s
1890
1893
David Ernest Walker
St John’s
St Mary’s
1851
1856
William Maude Haslewood
St John’s
St Mary’s
1857
1858
John Shaw
St John’s
St Mary’s
1873
1875
William Robert Worthington
Corpus Christi
St Mary’s
1885
1887
Harry Spencer Moore
Peterhouse
St Paul’s
1851
1854
James Hadfield
St John’s
St Paul’s
1857
1859
William Winlaw
St John’s
St Paul’s
1880
1881
Martin Shipham Munroe
Pembroke
St Paul’s
1886
1890
John Russell Napier
Trinity
St Paul’s
1886
1893
Frederick Eugène Perrin
St John’s
St Paul’s
1895
1902
Henry Pritt
Queens’
St Paul’s
1895
1898
Arthur William Charles
Trinity Hall
St Paul’s
1896
1899
Charles James Ferguson-Davie
Trinity Hall
St Paul’s
1899
1902
David Alston Hall
St Catharine’s
St Paul’s
1902
1906
Alfred Metcalfe Stephens
Corpus Christi
St Paul’s
1907
1907
Raymond Hargrave
Queens’
St Peter’s
1841
1842
Thomas Gleadowe Fearne
Not Given
St Peter’s
1879
1883
Alexander Glen Bott
St John’s
St Thomas’s
1845
1850
John Francis Israel Herschell
Queens’
St Thomas’s
1859
1862
Richard Price
St John’s
St Thomas’s
1893
1900
George Richard Plews
Matric Non-Coll
St Thomas’s
1906
1917
Archibald Edward Allen
Selwyn
Trinity
1846
1846
Andrew Heslop
Trinity
Trinity
1848
1850
John Kitton
St John’s
Trinity
1897
1904
Benjamin Allen Berry
Peterhouse
[1] University of Oxford. and Joseph Foster, Alumni Oxonienses: The Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714: Their Parentage Birthplace, and Year of Birth, with a Record of Their Degrees (Oxford: Parker and co., 1891). [2] University of Cambridge, John Venn, and J. A. Venn, Alumni Cantabrigienses; a Biographical List of All Known Students, Graduates and Holders of Office at the University of Cambridge, from the Earliest Times to 1900. (Cambridge, University Press, 1922-1954). [3] A. B. Emden, A Biographical Register of the University of Cambridge to 1500 (Cambridge University Press, 1963). [4] ‘ACAD – A Cambridge Alumni Database’, n.d., http://venn.lib.cam.ac.uk/acad/intro.html. [5] J. L. Dawson, ‘ACAD – A Cambridge Alumni Database: Introduction’ (ALLC/ACH 2000, Glasgow University, 2000), https://venn.lib.cam.ac.uk/Documents/acad/dawson.html. Published in Computers in Genealogy, Vol. 7 No. 8 (December 2001), pp. 363–375.
One thought on “Preston’s Cambridge men … and (a few) women”